Bethesda's epic sci-fi RPG is here, and it's a big one. From shipbuilding to exploring the surface of Mars, our thoughts so far.
Starfield Review... In Progress
The first trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6 is finally here.
Grand Theft Auto 6 Trailer
We take an in-depth look at Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora and tell you why it should be heavily on your radar!
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora - a Deep-Dive into its Potential
Range-wise, the ROG Rapture GT6 is phenomenal, and it's ideal for all gaming and non-gaming-related tasks.
ASUS ROG Rapture GT6 WiFi 6 Mesh System Review
Post by trog @ 12:27pm 09/08/11 | 7 Comments
The question and answer session with John Carmack from QuakeCon 2011 is now online - it's a little more accessible to those of us that don't have advanced degrees in hyperbolic topology (n-hey) so is worth a watch if you want to hear Carmack brain dumping on a variety of topics.

Some of the interesting points:

- while Rage won't initially have dedicated servers, it is possible that it might get them later
- dedicated servers will be a must-have in future id games
- voxel engines are something he's spent a lot of time looking at, but it sounds like he still thinks polygons are the way to go
- Quake Live isn't making money now and they're not looking at future free/ad-funded games
- outside of games, Carmack's rocketeering enterprise Armadillo Aerospace has actually been making money doing government contracts, but Carmack is worried that is holding them back, so they're going to stop doing that and he's simply going to fund their research.

Watch below!


QuakeCon 2011 "John Carmack Q&A" Video








Latest Comments
Eorl
Posted 12:35pm 09/8/11
Good to hear dedicated servers are hopefully going to be in Rage. But he is damn right that dedicated servers sell games.
Raven
Posted 12:58pm 09/8/11
I think it's massively interesting that we're now going back to Voxels - if you remember, this is the way nVidia created the NV1, which they abandoned in favour of the massively optimised for the Direct3D 5 spec (too far ahead of its time, in a D3D2/D3D 3 era) Riva 128.

Because everyone else, specifically S3 and then later Rendition and 3Dfx, went with Polygons and, as a result, texels, they had to go that way with all their future products, as it was a bit like asking people to write for both Glide and OpenGL, whereas NV1s Direct3D support was slow and buggy.

I'll be keen to see how the industry goes now that we're all on CUDA which handles voxels just lovely.
skythra
Posted 01:02pm 09/8/11
I'm guessing, that by "we're all" you mean Nvidia is all on cuda, i assume opencl does similar?
Raven
Posted 04:06pm 09/8/11
Sorta. I'm really not aware of any respectable projects using competing products - it's all mostly either CUDA or BlueGene around here :P
Rawprawn
Posted 07:32pm 09/8/11
Understood about 1/4 of it haha. Still interesting though!
The GuVna
Posted 08:24pm 09/8/11
Gotta love the 5 min answers to a simple question. His brain just has so much detail to get out. :)
Rawprawn
Posted 02:15am 11/8/11
haha, he also says "I" a lot. Either that or he has a bit of professor Frink in him.
Commenting has been locked for this item.
7 Comments
Show